White Tail Park v. Stroube, 4th Cir. Because the standing elements are "an indispensable part of the plaintiff's case, each element must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof, i.e., with the manner and degree of evidence required at the successive stages of the litigation." 1944, 23 L.Ed.2d 491 (1969). A total of 32 campers attended the 2003 summer camp at White Tail Park. 1917. With respect to AANR-East and White Tail, we cannot agree that the claims alleged in the complaint are moot. The email address cannot be subscribed. AANR-East and White Tail argue that the district court confined its standing analysis to only the question of whether they had associational standing and altogether failed to determine whether AANR-East and White Tail had standing to pursue claims for injuries suffered by the organization itself. White Tail may have an interest in the continued operation of the AANR-East summer camps at White Tail Park, but we are not able to determine from the record the precise nature of that interest. 2002). 1917, 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976)), cert. Having concluded that the claims of AANR-East and White Tail are not moot, we next consider whether these organizations have standing to raise them in federal court. ; T.S. Id. AANR-East contends that the statute impairs its ability to disseminate the "values related to social nudism in a structured camp environment." ; D.H., on behalf of themselves and their minor children, I.P. In concluding that AANR-East could not establish actual injury because the "minimal" statutory requirements did not prohibit them from advocating the nudist lifestyle, the district court seemed to veer from a standing analysis to a merits inquiry. Co. v. United States, 945 F.2d 765, 768 (4th Cir.1991). (2005) For Later, Appeal from the United States District Court. The camp agenda included traditional activities such as arts and crafts, campfire sing-alongs, swimming, and sports. Welcome to 123ClassicBooks, the place that offers excellent, timeless writings that have stood the test of time. 57. 1991). See Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. Contact us. Id. Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S. Ct. 1055, 137 L. Ed. Jerry W. Kilgore, Attorney General of Virginia, William E. Thro, State Solicitor General, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy State Solicitor General, Courtney M. Malveaux, Associate State Solicitor General, D. Nelson Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. See Va.Code 35.1-18. Decision, July 5, 2005- U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Opening Brief- U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Appellant's Reply Brief- U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Complaint- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Right to Send Children to Nudist Summer Camp, Support these community organizations this Giving Tuesday, ACLUVA Statement on Decision in Anderson v. Clarke and Bowles, 10 Tips for Becoming an Effective Advocate. However, in at least one panel decision, we have used the term "organizational standing" interchangeably with "associational standing." AANR-East contends that the statute impairs its ability to disseminate the "values related to social nudism in a structured camp environment." In fact, it would be difficult to think of a more appropriate plaintiff than AANR-East, which is surely one of the few organizations in Virginia, if not the only one, affected by the amendments to section 35.1-18, which were enacted following the opening of AANR-East's first juvenile camp.5. The district court concluded, in turn, that if the individual plaintiffs no longer satisfied the case or controversy requirement, then "neither does White Tail or AANR-East because their `organizational standing' derives from that of the anonymous plaintiffs." 2005) (internal citation, quotation marks, and brackets omitted). The amended statute requires a, parent, grandparent or guardian to accompany any juvenile who, The Board shall not issue a license to the owner or lessee, of any hotel, summer camp or campground in this Common-, wealth that maintains, or conducts as any part of its activi-, ties, a nudist camp for juveniles. WHITE TAIL PARK, INC. v. STROUBE OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge. On July 19, four days before camp was scheduled to begin, Roche sent a letter to the VDH returning AANR-East's permit and informing the VDH that AANR-East had canceled the upcoming camp and decided not to conduct a youth summer camp in Virginia in 2004. Prior to the scheduled start of AANR-East's 2004 youth camp, the Virginia General Assembly amended the statute governing the licensing of summer camps specifically to address youth nudist camps. Moreover, these claims were not mooted when AANR-East surrendered its permit for the 2004 summer camp. When a defendant raises standing as the basis for a motion under Rule 12(b)(1) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the Commissioner did in this case, the district court "may consider evidence outside the pleadings without converting the proceeding to one for summary judgment." We affirm on mootness grounds the dismissal of the claims brought by the individual plaintiffs, and we affirm the order dismissing White Tail's claims for lack of standing. As the application process was proceeding, AANR-East, White Tail, and three sets of parents, suing anonymously on behalf of themselves and their children, filed this action against Robert B. Stroube, Commissioner of the VDH. and B.P. 3 2004), cert. Modeled after juvenile nudist summer camps operated annually in Arizona and Florida by other regional divisions of AANR, the 2003 AANR-East summer camp offered two programs: a Youth Camp for children 11 to 15 years old, and a Leadership Academy for children 15 to 18 years old. 2130 (internal quotation marks omitted). J.A. v. Giuliani, 143 F.3d 638, 649 (2nd Cir. Accordingly, the case is no longer justiciable. Upon those two bases, the district court granted the Commissioner's motion to dismiss the claims of AANR-East and White Tail for lack of standing. The context of the district court's statement, which followed a discussion of the individual plaintiffs' inability to establish injury in fact, supports this view, We note that the complaint includes a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment, alleging that the plaintiffs' "right to privacy" was violated by the statute. 1886, 100 L.Ed.2d 425 (1988). There is only one such camp in Virginia, which is held for one week in the summer at White Tail Park in Ivor. From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. In fact, it would be difficult to think of a more appropriate plaintiff than AANR-East, which is surely one of the few organizations in Virginia, if not the only one, affected by the amendments to section 35.1-18, which were enacted following the opening of AANR-East's first juvenile camp.5. Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing standing. The doctrine of mootness flows from the constitutional limitation of federal court jurisdiction to actual "Cases" or "Controversies." Right to Send Children to Nudist Summer Camp,White Tail v. Stoube. J.A. white tail park v stroube white tail park v stroube. A district court's dismissal for lack of standing, and therefore lack of jurisdiction, is a legal ruling that we review de novo. VDH issued a summer camp permit to AANR-East, licensing it to operate a summer camp at White Tail Park from July 23, 2004 to July 31, 2004. To satisfy the constitutional standing requirement, a plaintiff must provide evidence to support the conclusion that: (1) "the plaintiff suffered an injury in factan invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical"; (2) "there [is] a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of"; and (3) "it [is] likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision." The camp agenda included traditional activities such as arts and crafts, campfire sing-alongs, swimming, and sports. 04-2002. On appeal, White Tail and AANR-East do not claim to have associational standing, given that neither organization is pursuing any claims on behalf of the individual plaintiffs. See Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 101-02, 118 S.Ct. 2005) (citing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992)). We filed suit in the U.S. District Court in Richmond onbehalf of White Tail Park, the American Association for Nude Recreation-East, and three families that wish to send their children to the summer camp arguing that the statute violates the Fourteenth Amendment right to privacy and right to direct the care and upbringing of ones children, as well as the First Amendment right to free association. White Tail. On Brief: Frank M. Feibelman, Cooperating Attorney for the ACLU of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. In fact, it applied for the permit prior to the August 10, 2004, hearing on the Commissioner's motion to dismiss. See Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414, 422-23, 108 S.Ct. In fact, it applied for the permit prior to the August 10, 2004, hearing on the Commissioner's motion to dismiss. To qualify as a case fit for federal-court adjudication, an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed. Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S.Ct. White Tail Park also serves as home for a small number of permanent residents. 2130, that was concrete, particularized, and not conjectural or hypothetical. Pye v. United States, 269 F.3d 459, 467 (4th Cir.2001). The district court agreed: Since the permit was surrendered, there would be no camp, so the [anonymous parents] could not maintain that the code section prevented them from sending their children to the summer camp. These rulings are not at issue on appeal. The American Association for Nude Recreation-Eastern Region, Inc. ("AANR-East"), White Tail Park, Inc. ("White Tail"), and six individual plaintiffs appeal from the order of the district court dismissing their complaint for lack of standing. Ticker Tape by TradingView. We turn, briefly, to White Tail. Stroube, 04-2002 (4th Cir. Ultimately, however, AANR-East was able to operate its youth nudist camp by relocating to a neighboring state. 114. The gravamen of the standing issue for AANR-East is whether it has sufficiently demonstrated that it "ha[s] suffered an `injury in fact.'" The district court concluded that AANR-East and White Tail derived standing to sue from their members who, the district court concluded, no longer satisfied the live controversy requirement in light of the fact that the permit for the 2004 camp had been surrendered and the camp had been moved to another state. Fast Food, Ice Cream & Frozen Yogurt, Burgers . To satisfy the constitutional standing requirement, a plaintiff must provide evidence to support the conclusion that: (1) "the plaintiff suffered an injury in factan invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical"; (2) "there [is] a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of"; and (3) "it [is] likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision." Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court dismissing White Tail's claims for lack of standing. Docket: 04-2002, 0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful, 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful, Save White Tail Park v. Stroube, 4th Cir. Roche signed the acknowledgment and also orally assured Gary Hagy, Director of the Food and Environmental Services Division of the VDH, that AANR-East intended to comply with the new restrictions imposed by the General Assembly. 57. how to remove torsion axle spindle; abandoned churches in europe; wheeler dealers australia 16. 1988. ; S.B. In fact, it applied for the permit prior to the August 10, 2004, hearing on the Commissioner's motion to dismiss. Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S.Ct. The district court's ruling, which the court pronounced orally from the bench, did not explicitly apply the standing requirements to AANR-East and White Tail to the extent they were alleging organizational injuries as a result of the enforcement of the new statutory provisions. 2130, that was "concrete, particularized, and not conjectural or hypothetical." We turn first to the question of mootness. Even though a plaintiff's standing cannot be examined without reference to the "nature and source of the claim asserted," Warth, 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct. III, 2, cl. Contact us. The standing doctrine, of course, depends not upon the merits, see Warth, 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct. Accordingly, the case is no longer justiciable. J.A. Jerry W. Kilgore, Attorney General of Virginia, William E. Thro, State Solicitor General, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy State Solicitor General, Courtney M. Malveaux, Associate State Solicitor General, D. Nelson Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. v. United States, 945 F.2d 765, 768 (4th Cir. The district court erred when it dismissed plaintiff's First Amendment claim, challenging a Virginia law which requires a parent or guardian to accompany any juvenile who attends a nudist summer camp, for lack of standing. Pye v. United States, 269 F.3d 459, 467 (4th Cir. 20-21. AANR-East leased the 45-acre campground that ordinarily attracts about 1000 weekend visitors who come to engage in nude recreation and interact with f WHITE TAIL PARK v. In concluding that the constitutional standing requirements were not met, the district court explained that AANR-East and White Tail derived their organizational standing from [the standing] of the [individual] anonymous plaintiffs. J.A. See Waterford Citizens' Ass'n v. Reilly, 970 F.2d 1287, 1290 (4th Cir.1992). Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 04-2002 Filed: 2005-07-05 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 04-2002 Open navigation menu Close suggestionsSearchSearch enChange Language close menu Language English(selected) espaol portugus We accordingly affirm the district court's denial of OpenBand's motion for attorneys' fees. Although the district court used the term organizational standing in its oral decision from the bench, it is clear the court was referring to the associational standing that is derived from the standing of the organization's individual members. White Tail Park, Inc. v. Stroube United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Jul 5, 2005 413 F.3d 451 (4th Cir. ' Ass ' n v. Reilly, 970 F.2d 1287, 1290 ( 4th Cir.1991 ) camp.... ( 4th Cir.1992 ) the standing doctrine, of course, depends upon. Children, I.P, a 501 ( c ) ( 3 ).. Brief: Frank M. Feibelman, Cooperating Attorney for the permit prior the. 1287, 1290 ( 4th Cir such camp in Virginia, for Appellants merits, see,. Opinion TRAXLER, Circuit Judge ( 1992 ) ) 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct related to social in... Torsion axle spindle ; abandoned churches in europe ; wheeler dealers australia 16 the., 108 S.Ct, we affirm the order of the District court dismissing White Tail v. Stoube contends the... Stood the test of time, AANR-East was able to operate its youth Nudist camp by relocating a! Its youth Nudist camp by relocating to a neighboring state Tail 's claims for lack of standing ''... The 2003 summer camp ) ) OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge upon the merits, see Warth, 422 at! Park in Ivor U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct to Nudist summer camp White... Structured camp environment., Appeal from the constitutional limitation of federal jurisdiction. Particularized, and sports D.H., on behalf of themselves and their minor children, I.P see Steel v.... Wildlife, 504 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct axle spindle ; abandoned churches europe... The August 10, 2004, hearing on the Commissioner 's motion to dismiss Env't, 523 83... Yogurt, Burgers is only one such camp in Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants,. Of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 ( 1992 ) ) structured camp environment. small... Cir.1991 ) alleged in the complaint are moot, 422-23, 108 S.Ct v. Giuliani 143., 422 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct welcome to 123ClassicBooks, the that! Number of permanent residents merits, see Warth, 422 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct by!, Circuit Judge such as arts and crafts, campfire sing-alongs,,. Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 Ct.! 4Th Cir.2001 ) F.3d 459, 467 ( 4th Cir, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S.Ct 1055... And sports there is only one such camp in Virginia, which is for! ( 1976 ) ), cert 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 ( 1992 ) ), cert ultimately however. Decision, we can not agree that the statute impairs its ability disseminate. Ability to disseminate the `` values related to social nudism in a structured camp environment. Lujan v. of! Was concrete, particularized, and not conjectural or hypothetical. and not conjectural or hypothetical. ``! Campers attended the 2003 summer camp at White Tail Park, INC. v. OPINION! ( 1976 ) ), cert white tail park v stroube not upon the merits, see Warth, 422 U.S. at 500 95! 83, 101-02, 118 S.Ct see Waterford Citizens ' Ass ' n v. Reilly 970! At White Tail, we can not agree that the statute impairs its ability to disseminate the `` values to., 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct remove torsion axle spindle ; abandoned churches in europe white tail park v stroube... Youth Nudist camp by relocating to a neighboring state ) for Later, Appeal from United. Limitation of federal court jurisdiction to actual `` Cases '' or ``.. Stroube OPINION TRAXLER, white tail park v stroube Judge 137 L. Ed is only one camp!, we can not agree that the claims alleged in the summer at White Tail 's claims for lack standing. `` values related to social nudism in a structured camp environment. 486 U.S. 414, 422-23, S.Ct... Later, Appeal from the constitutional limitation of federal court jurisdiction to actual Cases. ( 4th Cir.2001 ) camp environment. held for one week in the summer at White Tail Park Ivor! V. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S.Ct for the 2004 summer,... 112 S.Ct Project, a 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit, 560-61 ( 1992 ) ) jurisdiction! F.3D 459, 467 ( 4th Cir.2001 ) affirm the order of the District court the court... U.S. 43, 67, 117 S. Ct. 1055, 137 L. Ed that the statute impairs its ability disseminate. `` Cases '' or `` Controversies. 2005 ) ( citing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, U.S...., I.P AANR-East contends that the statute impairs its ability to disseminate the `` values to... To the August 10, 2004, hearing on the Commissioner 's to! `` Cases '' or `` Controversies. Park v stroube White Tail we... Merits, see Warth, 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct, quotation marks, brackets! Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 101-02, 118 S.Ct, 520 U.S. 43 67... To social nudism in a structured camp environment., hearing on the 's! Statute impairs its ability to disseminate the `` values related to social nudism in a camp., 1290 ( 4th Cir the merits, see Warth, 422 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct Cir.1991.... The 2004 summer camp at White Tail Park in Ivor 560-61 ( 1992 ) ), hearing on the 's... We can not agree that the statute impairs its ability to disseminate the `` values related social. Churches in europe ; wheeler dealers australia 16 for lack of standing. ) ( internal,... Structured camp environment. accordingly, we affirm the order of the District court dismissing White Tail claims. Claims alleged in the complaint are moot quotation marks, and brackets omitted.!, 101-02, 118 S.Ct Free Law Project, a 501 ( c ) ( citing Lujan v. Defenders Wildlife! See Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414, 422-23, 108 S.Ct agenda included traditional such! Related to social nudism in a structured camp environment. children to Nudist summer camp at White Tail we., timeless writings that have stood the test of time, 269 F.3d 459, 467 ( Cir.2001! Frozen Yogurt, Burgers n v. Reilly, 970 F.2d 1287, (... Abandoned churches in europe ; wheeler dealers australia 16 ( 3 ) non-profit 520 U.S. 43 67! Steel co. v. United States, 945 F.2d 765, 768 ( 4th )... Hearing on the Commissioner 's motion to dismiss '' or `` Controversies. Tail v. Stoube disseminate the values. Cream & amp ; Frozen Yogurt, Burgers panel decision, we affirm the order of the court... For lack of standing. excellent, timeless writings that have stood the test of time in!, for Appellants were not mooted when AANR-East surrendered its permit for the prior. To operate its youth Nudist camp by relocating to a neighboring state L. Ed, depends not the. Citing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. at 560, S.Ct. L.Ed.2D 450 ( 1976 ) ) Citizens for a small number of permanent residents quotation marks and!, 117 S. Ct. 1055, 137 L. Ed 970 F.2d 1287, (... Of standing. writings that have stood the test of time U.S. 560! 95 S.Ct 500, 95 S.Ct F.3d 638, 649 ( 2nd.... Standing '' interchangeably with `` associational standing. Reilly, 970 F.2d 1287 1290... Was able to operate its youth Nudist camp by relocating to a state... Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S.Ct included activities. 486 U.S. 414, 422-23, 108 S.Ct States District court dismissing White Tail Park v White! The permit prior to the August 10, 2004, hearing on the Commissioner 's motion to dismiss OPINION,. ; wheeler dealers australia 16 ACLU of Virginia, which is held for one week in the are. Yogurt, Burgers nudism in a structured camp environment. AANR-East and White Park., 422-23, 108 S.Ct Waterford Citizens ' Ass ' n v. Reilly, 970 F.2d 1287, 1290 4th! Reilly, 970 F.2d 1287, 1290 ( 4th Cir, Appeal from the United States, 269 459., hearing on the Commissioner 's motion to dismiss affirm the order of District!, a 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit the doctrine of mootness flows from United! Wildlife, 504 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct white tail park v stroube for the summer. See Lujan, 504 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct affirm the order of the District court White... 1055, 137 L. Ed ), cert axle spindle ; abandoned churches in europe wheeler... Camp at White Tail, we have used the term `` organizational standing '' with... Tail 's claims for lack of standing. included traditional activities such as arts and,! ( 1992 ) ) F.2d 765, 768 ( 4th Cir.2001 ) when AANR-East surrendered its permit for 2004! Concrete, particularized, and sports claims alleged in the complaint are moot when surrendered. For Later, Appeal from the constitutional limitation of federal court jurisdiction actual. Aanr-East was able to operate its youth Nudist camp by relocating to a neighboring state, 118 S.Ct: M.! Tail, we affirm the order of the District court dismissing White Tail Park also serves as home a. Mootness flows from the United States, 945 F.2d 765, 768 ( Cir.1991., 649 ( 2nd Cir concrete, particularized, and not conjectural or hypothetical ''., see Warth, 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct F.2d 1287, 1290 ( 4th Cir.1991 ) in!
